Up until this point, even though the new GAKT version was live, Google gave you the option to use the previous one. As of today, the old tool is gone for good. The new one tends to display SIGNIFICANTLY lower keyword search volume numbers, which brings us to the question which is on everyone’s mind right now: which numbers are (more) accurate?
Before this decision, people were able to work with the old tool by clicking on the link below:
https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal?forceLegacy=true
As you can see, this is no longer possible.
Some people say the new interface sucks but I honestly don’t care about the eye candy or even usability component. The only thing I do care about: the search volume numbers.
The old tool included data from search partners as well, while the new one is based on Google.com search traffic only. Now it’s obvious that this brought about a decrease in search traffic numbers but what I can’t find an explanation for is the magnitude of the decrease.
What do you guys think about this change and what is your explanation for this dramatic (in a lot of cases) decrease?
Source: NamePros
September 25th, 2010 at 12:37 am
Yes, I noticed dramatic drops in numbers.
Where did you find the old tool included data from google partner searches?
September 25th, 2010 at 12:43 am
@Mike: they have mentioned this on the official blog.
“… we’ve also changed how we calculate Global Monthly Searches and Local Monthly Searches. Statistics in these columns are now based on Google.com search traffic only. Previously, they also included traffic from search partners.”
Here’s the blog post I am referring to:
http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/09/updated-keyword-tool-out-of-beta.html
September 25th, 2010 at 3:19 am
I wouldn’t be surprised if they come with a new tool next year, what’s so friggen hard for them to gauge their own traffic???????
September 25th, 2010 at 3:48 am
Tools can’t be trusted, not even if they come from Google. They could have given two choices right from the beginning if they wanted to, google search or google search together with google search partnets. But they didn’t even though it wasn’t hard.
September 25th, 2010 at 5:36 am
A search is still a search even if it is not made on Google’s website.They should just put both together instead of confusion..
September 25th, 2010 at 6:43 am
I found that one does not have the option to select exact searches. What is the Local Monthly Search really about? If it is not the number of times people search the exact word/phrase, then what is it? Thanks.
September 25th, 2010 at 6:49 am
whats even scarier is the drops in local numbers my asian search term in which had 20k exact has dropped to 250.
September 25th, 2010 at 7:01 am
This new tool is totally worthless. I don’t believe these numbers
I am finding examples where some domains have tripled in traffic or more. I have one that went from 70,000 to 368,000 searches now. However, I do see many that have gone down in total searches.
Why are some of the same exact keywords listed twice? The first has numbers, the second is all zeros.
Without Exact searches this tool can do very little for anyone. Even before using the Exact search it was still tricky, now it’s worthless.
So, the big question: What is everyone going to use now? Word Tracker? Old Overture results?
This really sucks.
September 25th, 2010 at 7:05 am
Thanks for sharing…I was confused last night, didn’t know which numbers to choose…no result had seemed to be the right one.
September 26th, 2010 at 4:04 am
I came across rather disturbing details about the exact search results, getting on first page and only seeing less then 2% click throughs.
The keyword is HIV TEST and it gets over 50k exact unique searches every month. The domain in question is HIVTEST dot com – it is on first page of google / bing / yahoo.
I don’t own this domain but was thinking about buying it. After the guy asked for a mid 5 figure price, I asked him to justify the price. He said the 50k exact searches and CPC over $2.2 USD and proudly said its on first page of ALL search engines for the exact keyword. SO I demanded stats. He claimed he didn’t have any however almost all servers have at least AWSTATS or the other stat program. Finally he coughed up the numbers and it came to less then 1k uniques a month.
What does this tell me? That I’ve spent a great fortune buying domains partially based off flaky data. The new Adwords tool shows global 15k exact searches. From the original 2% click throughs based off the 50k to now 6% click throughs basing off the 15k.
Still, the numbers are off by far for something thats on first page on all 3 engines in numerous countries. It should be getting at least 3-5k uniques a month minimum from my experience.
September 27th, 2010 at 4:22 am
What happened to do no evil ?
Google are as EVIL as they get.
One day treating us – the people who bring them money, so badly, is going to blow up in their face …
September 29th, 2010 at 4:11 pm
I cannot believe the old keyword tool is finally gone. It was so much more user friendly. Adding additional keywords to your exciting keywords was so easy and duplicates was prevented.
When searching an domain Google nice made related groups for you. This was very handy for making ad groups in Google content network.
Why would Google take away all those nice functions of the old keyword tool?
I lot of extra work for me. Thank you Google.
Regards
Colin
October 7th, 2010 at 1:51 am
On the old interface when you did a search with synonyms checked, it brought back the results in groups. In the first group it showed all the highly relevant, related search terms. This made it really easy to export those keywords, and continue your search for keywords. In the new tool, it brings back all those groupings of keywords into the same list, making it very difficult to pick out the relevant keywords, and therefore find good, relevant keywords that you hadn’t thought of. It would be great if Google went back to this grouping method to help us find the most relevant keywords, and new keywords ideas.
October 9th, 2010 at 4:39 am
Is there a way to tell what the top bid amount is for a keyword or key phrase in Google AdWords without bidding on it? For example: What is the current cost per click for … “Computer Peripherals”?
October 14th, 2010 at 5:52 am
I located that 1 does not have the option to pick out specific searches. What the heck is the Native Month-to-month Research truly about? If it will not be the variety of times people investigation the precise word/phrase, then what exactly is it? Thanks.
October 14th, 2010 at 5:54 am
I positioned that 1 doesn’t have the option to select specific searches. What the heck will be the Native Month-to-month Investigation really about? If it won’t be the range of times folks investigation the exact word/phrase, then what specifically is it? Thanks.
October 14th, 2010 at 5:54 am
I situated that 1 will not have the choice to select specific searches. What the heck is the Native Month-to-month Analysis genuinely about? If it won’t be the wide variety of instances folks investigation the precise word/phrase, then what exactly is it? Thanks.
December 1st, 2010 at 4:58 pm
Glad it was just a dream because Google had DEFINITELY become evil, though not in a manner that anyone would expect.|VillageAdsSeo|
February 1st, 2011 at 1:04 pm
To me, so far it sucks.
I’ve been trying to use with Keyword Corral but the software won’t pick up any of the data from the saved CSV file, besides the Search Volume. All the other columns show up blank.
I’m being forced to give up KC (which appears to be an excellent tool) just because “Almighty” Google, in its arrogance, decided to shove down our throats this new stupid version of its Keyword Tool.
Too bad we don’t have a choice. If I had, I would say goodbye to Google.
April 26th, 2011 at 12:07 pm
hey and thank you for the info : I have definitely discovered new stuff through your site. I however came across a few on site difficulties browsing this blog. I was curious about if your hosting is fine? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading times might very likely affect your ranking in google and can damage your good quality information on this site. Well I will be putting this Rss feed to my email and can look forward to more of your interesting articles..
May 7th, 2011 at 2:06 am
Interesting post , I’m going to spend more time researching this topic
May 7th, 2011 at 2:06 am
Great post , I’m going to spend more time researching this subject
August 8th, 2011 at 4:52 pm
There are actually quite a lot of particulars like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to convey.
September 20th, 2011 at 11:05 am
Hey there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one? Thanks a lot!
September 25th, 2011 at 6:24 am
Hey there, You’ve done an excellent job here. I will definitely be back. And will personally recommend it to my friends. I am confident they will benefit from this web site. Thanx.
February 28th, 2012 at 6:07 pm
This are good yet again physical exercises whereby can help you loosen all the spinal column along with sleep accurately without the working experience concerning overload on yet again.
April 8th, 2012 at 3:41 am
Hello my family member! I wish to say that this post is amazing, great written and come with approximately all important infos. I’d like to peer more posts like this .
May 3rd, 2012 at 9:01 am
Just desire to say your article is as astounding. The clearness for your put up is simply cool and i can think you are an expert on this subject. Fine along with your permission allow me to clutch your feed to stay up to date with drawing close post. Thanks 1,000,000 and please carry on the enjoyable work.
May 22nd, 2012 at 10:48 am
Hi there, I found your website via Google while looking for a related topic, your website came up, it appears good. I’ve added to favourites|added to my bookmarks.