Banners - $14.5 Each - UNLIMITED Revisions
 

Categorized | How-To Guides

Domain Names and Search Engine Traffic

Posted on 18 November 2009 by BillionDollarMedia

Lots of people earn a living by chasing after search engine traffic exclusively, so why shouldn’t investors also earn a living (or at the very least make some decent coin) by sending some domains their way?

Seriously, Why Not?

Find one person who generates and monetizes search engine traffic for a living and who says that exact match domains don’t help “quite a bit”, I dare you. It simply makes sense: by owning an exact match domain, you’re basically telling search engines exactly what your website focuses on.

As a result, the fundamentals are definitely there and, personally, I see no reason why an exact match domain should carry less weight in the future. If anything, these domains will end up helping even MORE down the road.

Think About It!

What do search engines want? They want to reward the sites which provide the most value to the average visitor.

Does owning a great domain send a message across? Yep, it tells search engines that you mean business. And since great domains will definitely go up in value, it will be more and more obvious that only people with a decent budget will be able to afford an exact match dot com, dot net or dot org.

So, what will search engines “think” of a company which owns a great domain? Well, how’s about something along the lines of “this company seems to have a decent budget at its disposal, these guys seem to be in it for the long haul”? Do you think that these things don’t matter to the people who are constantly improving algos? Think again!

And let’s not forget one important thing: the age of a domain! All of the great exact match dot coms, dot nets and dot orgs have been regged for quite a while and that definitely helps. Again:

It All Makes Perfect Sense!

1) It’s highly unlikely that exact match dot coms, dot nets and dot orgs will carry less weight in the future

2) On the contrary, common sense tells us that these domains will probably carry significantly MORE weight down the road

3) The indirect benefits of exact match domains (since most of them have been registered for a long time, age – for example – represents an important indirect benefit) are also worth taking into consideration

4) If you decide to take things to the next level and milk other traffic sources (especially if we’re talking about word of mouth advertising), the domain will (once again), be an asset: authoritative and extremely easy to remember!

The list could go on and on but this much is certain: folks who think that domains are not important to people who want to chase after search engine traffic don’t have a clue! Personally, I wouldn’t even think about trying to target an extremely competitive keyword without a great domain: if you don’t have an edge, you’re better off focusing on another keyword. Use your brain, stop buying/regging crap and start making some serious cash!

10 Comments For This Post

  1. nmwando Says:

    After 10-20 years when there will be tens of new global tlds, just imagine how valuable domains which are 10 or more years old today will be. How valuable do you think a domain registered in 2000 will be in 2030? Even the thought of it is exciting!!

  2. GimmE Says:

    How many exact searches constitute a good domain?There’s always controversy about this,any thoughts?

  3. Nick Says:

    Releasing search volume data is probably the most important thing google ever did, most webmasters have no idea just how important this information is. While it may not be 100% accurate, it’s as close to 100% accurate as anyone will get and surely way more accurate than any 3rd party application. Search engine data coming from the actual search engine is everything webmasters could have asked for.

  4. Xdreamer Says:

    It’s hard to compete against exact match domains. When I search for some terms to check out how powerful the competition is, it’s very rare not to encounter an exact match.

  5. Yaron Says:

    I couldnt agree more. direct navigation / type-in traffic is very important and a domain that gets a lot of “organic” type-in is great.
    however, exact match is as important when coming to evaluate a domain.

  6. Boogiercedder Says:

    I really enjoyed reading this article, keep on posting such exciting posts.

  7. celluliteaqueuse Says:

    Hi, your site is beautyfull Many thanks for sharing.

  8. Hotels Carcassonne Says:

    Hi, your website is extremely lovely ; you have made a good choice.

  9. Web Hosting And Domain Says:

    Choosing a good domain name is the most important factor in my opinion.

  10. Phuket Says:

    I and my guys have been looking through the excellent secrets found on the blog and so at once got a horrible suspicion I had not expressed respect to the web site owner for those tips. Those guys happened to be certainly glad to study all of them and have in effect quite simply been taking advantage of these things. Thanks for genuinely simply considerate and also for obtaining varieties of very good subjects most people are really wanting to be aware of. My personal sincere regret for not expressing appreciation to you earlier.

Leave a Reply

 
 
         
 
 
 
Domaining blog recommended by Domaining.com
 
Recommended by DomainState.com


 

Top Commentators

  •  

    Your Click Counts

     

    Our Projects

     

    Blogroll

     
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (21)
  • December 2011 (30)
  • November 2011 (21)
  • October 2011 (10)
  • September 2011 (8)
  • August 2011 (4)
  • July 2011 (23)
  • June 2011 (14)
  • May 2011 (13)
  • April 2011 (16)
  • March 2011 (12)
  • February 2011 (11)
  • January 2011 (8)
  • December 2010 (4)
  • November 2010 (4)
  • October 2010 (9)
  • September 2010 (4)
  • August 2010 (2)
  • July 2010 (2)
  • June 2010 (4)
  • May 2010 (6)
  • April 2010 (1)
  • March 2010 (10)
  • February 2010 (16)
  • January 2010 (18)
  • December 2009 (8)
  • November 2009 (25)
  • October 2009 (10)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • September 2008 (1)
  • August 2008 (1)
  • May 2008 (2)
  • April 2008 (16)
  • March 2008 (8)
  • February 2008 (12)
  • January 2008 (1)
  •