<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Names and Social Media Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html</link>
	<description>Learn the Art of Domaining</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:36:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-11959</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainingtips.com/?p=301#comment-11959</guid>
		<description>@Xdreamer: I&#039;d advise against investing in CVCV or VCVC dot coms because there are (at the very least) 1 gazillion better opportunities. Maybe these domains will only be worth 3 figs a few years from now, maybe they&#039;ll be worth let&#039;s say 20% - 40% more but again: why play this game and not focus on opportunities with considerably more potential?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Xdreamer: I&#8217;d advise against investing in CVCV or VCVC dot coms because there are (at the very least) 1 gazillion better opportunities. Maybe these domains will only be worth 3 figs a few years from now, maybe they&#8217;ll be worth let&#8217;s say 20% &#8211; 40% more but again: why play this game and not focus on opportunities with considerably more potential?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xdreamer</title>
		<link>http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-11901</link>
		<dc:creator>Xdreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainingtips.com/?p=301#comment-11901</guid>
		<description>I think a cvcv will be worth less than 1000 in 5 or 6 years, do you agree Andrei? Maybe a few hundreds yes but without a doubt not thousands I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a cvcv will be worth less than 1000 in 5 or 6 years, do you agree Andrei? Maybe a few hundreds yes but without a doubt not thousands I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lafaye</title>
		<link>http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-11885</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lafaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainingtips.com/?p=301#comment-11885</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no doubt that memorable is best and in Digg&#039;s case it happens to be a LLLL that has inherent meaning with the added &quot;g&quot; as a twist.

The recent rebranding by UltimateBet.com to UB.com has more to do with how their customers know them already and ub certainly makes it easier on the &#039;ol mobile fingers but &quot;Ultimate Bet&quot; is a better and more memorable brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that memorable is best and in Digg&#8217;s case it happens to be a LLLL that has inherent meaning with the added &#8220;g&#8221; as a twist.</p>
<p>The recent rebranding by UltimateBet.com to UB.com has more to do with how their customers know them already and ub certainly makes it easier on the &#8216;ol mobile fingers but &#8220;Ultimate Bet&#8221; is a better and more memorable brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-11882</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainingtips.com/?p=301#comment-11882</guid>
		<description>@scubadub: I definitely don&#039;t see any long-term potential, the fundamentals are just not there IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@scubadub: I definitely don&#8217;t see any long-term potential, the fundamentals are just not there IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scubadub</title>
		<link>http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-11880</link>
		<dc:creator>scubadub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainingtips.com/?p=301#comment-11880</guid>
		<description>What do you think about CVCV and VCVC? How do you see the values going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about CVCV and VCVC? How do you see the values going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmwando</title>
		<link>http://domainingtips.com/domain-names-social-media-traffic.html/comment-page-1#comment-11878</link>
		<dc:creator>nmwando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainingtips.com/?p=301#comment-11878</guid>
		<description>bwhahahahah so true! I don&#039;t even remember 3 of the 5 domains and it&#039;s only been a minute since I finished reading your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bwhahahahah so true! I don&#8217;t even remember 3 of the 5 domains and it&#8217;s only been a minute since I finished reading your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
