Archive | UDRP

Tags: , , , , ,

Managing domain profits and losses

Posted on 02 June 2018 by NamePros Daily

Today: Large retailers with .net or non .com / WSB.com Sold for $85,000 / Trademark holder Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act / And more!

Here are the new discussions that caught my eye in the domain community today:

MalaysianEstate.com – There is a real estate market in every country, but does that mean there is a market for geo real estate domains in every country too? What’s this one worth?

A company asked me to return my domain to them – Have you ever been asked to return a domain you just registered or won at a drop auction fair and square? Did you eat the loss and turn it over or did you fight for it?

AcousticMelody.com – This domain seems to roll off the tongue smoothly. It passes the radio test as well. Is that enough to give it value though?

Trademark holder Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act – Have you ever run into a situation like this before? It seems a bit strange that anyone would have rights to a domain name that was owned way before a trademark was created.

WSB.com Sold for $85,000 – A very nice three letter .com five digit domain name sales report. High five digits seem ok for this one, but it sure is a far cry from six digits.

Large retailers with .net or non .com – How many large retail corporations that use a .net of non.com domain extension and do not use a .com?

Managing domain profits and losses – How have you been doing with our investments and sales in 2018 so far? How do you keep track of your profits and losses?

Comments Off on Managing domain profits and losses

Much Ado about emotions. Why ADO.com was lost

Posted on 05 February 2018 by Graham Haynes

Cognitive Bias

Our own Francois Carrillo lost a UDRP for the domain ADO(.)com and has been ordered to transfer it to the Mexican bus company who operates on ADO.com.mx.

We can hear the outcry across the domaining world – give the panellists the dunce award; how could they come up with such a bad decision; why are they so gullible, can they not see that domaining is a legitimate and accepted business model. What were they thinking, it makes no sense.

Well let me make sense of it: it is wrong to think the panel had a bad day or that they didn’t think it through or they are stupid. It is the complete opposite because to apply the policy rules and then to come to their verdict, they had to perform intellectual gymnastics. Later I will explain why they went to such lengths.

Continue Reading

Comments Off on Much Ado about emotions. Why ADO.com was lost

 
 
Domaining blog recommended by Domaining.comRecommended by DomainState.com  Recommended by NamePros.com

 
 
 
 
  • Top Commentators (Resets Weekly)